Thank God (The Christian God) That Donald Trump Has Given Us Permission To Say "Happy New Year" Again

First President Trump brought back saying "Merry Christmas". An affirmation of this Christian holiday that the entire nation should be celebrating the birth of our Lord and Savior. Because we are a Christian nation. Barack Obama (being a devout Muslim) hated that Christian Americans (the Majority) celebrate during the month of December. He might have signed an executive order on the issue (I'd have to look that up to be sure).

As I previously related, I know from personal experience that wishing people a "Merry Christmas" was at least strongly discouraged. I bet you didn't know, however, that "Happy New Year" was similarly discouraged. As per the Islamic calendar (the Hijri calendar), "The current Islamic year is 1439 AH. In the Gregorian calendar, 1439 AH runs from approximately 21 September 2017 to 10 September 2018".

The Gregorian calendar is the calendar we use in the Western/Christian world. A new year for Muslims does not come to pass until September 10, 2018. January 1, 2018 (Gregorian calendar) is just another day for Muslims. Muslims like the prior president, Barack HUSSEIN Obama. If Obama discouraged saying Merry Christmas because he didn't recognize Christmas (as a Muslim), he SURELY did not recognize New Year's Day as any kind of holiday.

This is a fact I was previously blissfully unaware of. How did I find out you may ask? Dan told me. Dan, as you may recall, is the office Liberal. Or the only person in the office whom everyone knows is a Liberal due to the fact that he's obnoxious about it.

"Happy New Year" I wished a number of my co workers after we returned to work in 2013 after the Christmas holiday. Including Aadila, a Muslim woman who is part of the secretarial pool. You could tell she is Muslim because she wears a hijab. I found out about that after I asked her why she was wearing a scarf all the time.

So, I was working at my computer when Dan approached me. Sitting in a chair next to my desk, Dan said, "hey, buddy, you probably don't know it, but Aadila, as a Muslim, doesn't follow the same calendar as we do. By wishing her a happy new year, you're offending her religion".

WTF? I responded. Dan started to explain, but I got and left. "Bathroom emergency" I lied as I walked away briskly. I had to get away from Dan before he angered me so much I was tempted to punch him in the nose (what eventually got me fired). Anyway, while in the bathroom I decided to "release some tension" and rub one out. Before "release" I decided to snap a pic of my powerful erection and send it to Aadila.

She might be a Muslim, but she's also incredibly hot. I don't want to date her, but I surely won't mind a one night stand. Hopefully my dick pic would convince her of the same. Like romancing a woman to convince her that you should date, the purpose of a dick pic is to convince a lady that you and her should bang. Once, just for the joy of it. Women are human beings, after all. And we're ALL sexual animals.

I surely couldn't expect her to make a decision in favor of one night of passion with no idea of what my equipment looks like, right? I mean, what if we got naked and she found out that my junk was "fun sized"? Not that that was a possibility, given how LARGE I am down there. But how would she now without a picture?

Unfortunately Aadila and I never hooked up. The BITCH reported me to HR and I was called in for some "counseling". I lied and said I sent the pic by accident and it was intended for my RECEIPTIVE girlfriend. What ended up happening is that the firm paid Aadila some money to go away. And a letter of "reprimand" was placed in my permanent file.

"You are so close to being fired" the big boss told me. "Now, given the fact that you're our most productive agent, I would really hate to have to do that" the boss said, smiling. Then we laughed about the dick pic. "Wow!" the boss exclaimed. "I can definitely see why you'd be interested in hitting that" he exclaimed, making a "large bazooms" motion with his hands.

"Unfortunately we can't have it, Barlowe. I should dock your pay for what we had to pay Aadila to go away. But I'll just take it out of your bonus. Now, don't do it again" the boss said, winking. Fortunately (for me) the #meetoo CRAP was years away.

"I have a wife, a mistress and a girlfriend, Barlowe. But I didn't meet any of them here at the firm. From now on consider all women who work here off limits". "Look, but don't touch", I replied. "Got it boss". "Exactly" the boss agreed. "Also, don't say anything that could get you in trouble. We all know how sensitive chicks are".

Anyway, I'd like to wish my readers a very Happy New Year. Now that I'm ALLOWED to do so, what with a fine Christian man like Donald J Trump in the White House. As opposed to a Muslim America hater like the former potus.

TLB #96, BS #14.

Praise Jesus! Our Godly Leader Donald Trump Allows Us To Say "Merry Christmas" Again

This is after 8 LONG years of a Muslim being in charge. And saying "no way" to displays by Christians of "the reason for the season". I know that I am so happy to have a real Godly Christian man back in the White House. As opposed to tratorious Muslim vermin like Obama and family.

Now, if you're thinking, "wait a minute, Barlowe. Saying Merry Christmas was never outlawed", I must strongly disagree. Not "outlawed" per say, but I know for a FACT that it was strongly discouraged. The firm where I work switched from having CHRISTMAS parties to HOLIDAY parties. This, even though I'm sure my old boss was and is still a Republican. I'm not sure if he voted for Trump or not, though (I left the firm before the 2016 election).

In any case, I, during one of these "holiday" parties, innocently wished a number of my fellow employees a very Merry Christmas. I did this because I am a Christian who acknowledges that the reason that we celebrate is due to the birth of our Lord and savior, Jesus Christ. Does this OFFEND non Christians? Perhaps, but I seriously do not give a f*ck. This is America and (as per the Founding Fathers) also a CHRISTIAN Nation!

Anyway, my wishing people a "Merry Christmas" (both before, during and after the "Holiday Party") apparently offended someone. I suspect it was the Muslim. There is (or was) some brown skinned woman who wore a hijab employed as a secretary. And, YES, I did wish her a "Merry Christmas" on multiple occasions. It was after I loudly wished "Aadila" (I think that was her name) a very Merry Christmas that Dan (the Liberal slacker) approached me. According to Dan I was disrespecting Aadila's religion and making her uncomfortable.

Well, I told Dan to piss off. America is a Christian Nation and Muslims, if they don't like it, can go back where they came from. Aadila, and other Muslims, should be grateful to live in a country where they are granted such freedom. Dan, a sour look on his mug, told me that he'd be reporting me to HR. I told him to go ahead and do that. Then I walked away. Even though he continued to lecture me. "Don't walk away from me when I'm talking" Dan objected.

"F*ck off Dan" I said angrily (though under my breath so nobody but Dan could hear). Dan obviously got it that I was in no mood to be messed with and he left, although he did march straight into HR. It wasn't long after that that the big boss called me into his office. "We can't have this, Barlowe!" the big boss bellowed. "Can't have what?" I responded. "I've heard about your anti-Muslim bigotry. This is an all inclusive firm and YOUR bigotry will not be tolerated!"

WTF, I thought. "You're talking about me wishing people a Merry Christmas?" I asked. "I think that you should stop saying that", the boss man countered. "Try Happy Holidays instead" he suggested. Although I could tell that it wasn't a suggestion. This was surely the result of a Muslim being in charge of our nation. Of that I had no doubt. And now that a Christian man is president again, it is crystal clear.

Obama (a Muslim) as president had a chilling effect on the utterance of the phrase "Merry Christmas". I know this is a FACT due to me personally being told not to wish anyone (in my workplace) a "Merry Christmas". So, before you buy into the Liberal bullshit about "Merry Christmas" never being verboten during the Obama administration, just know that they're lying.

Praise be to Trump for bringing back "Merry Christmas". And it will be a very Merry Christmas, what with the spectacular gift POTUS Trump has bestowed upon us. I refer to the tax cuts. Barlowe, being the proprietor of a pass through entity, will benefit greatly.

Paul Ryan wants to go after entitlements next, and to that I say "it's about time". Let these poor losers get jobs and pay for their own "necessities" (big screen TVs, Play Station 3s, Mercedes, steaks and shrimp for every meal, etc) instead of MOOCHING off hard working tax paying MAKERS like myself!

TLB #95, BS #13.

Father Of Canadian Born Ted Cruz Linked To JFK Assassin Oswald

As you likely know, Ted Cruz, the man ineligible to be president due to being born a Canadian citizen, dropped out of the race for the White House. Thank goodness. Not that there was any doubt in my mind AT ALL that Mr. Trump would prevail. But if Cruz somehow had become the nominee, you can bet that the question of his eligibility would have plagued and likely derailed his campaign.

Yes, the current president isn't eligible to hold the office of the president for the same reason (not born in the United States), but Ted Cruz was running as a Republican! Whereas it was fine to sweep B. Hussein's lack of a non-forged birth certificate under the rug because it was "racist" to question the eligibility of the first Black president, Ted Cruz is a White Republican.

Or Cruz is perceived as such, despite being Hispanic on his father's side. Much the same as Hussein is Black (and Muslim) on HIS father's side. But, like I said, with Hussein none of that mattered very much. He was still able to run for and "win" an office he wasn't eligible to hold.

But the hypocrite Dems would have objected to Ted Cruz being the nominee (if he had "won"). I heard that a nutjob from Florida named Alan Grayson said "he'll sue over Canadian-born Cruz's natural-born citizen status if the senator is the GOP nominee".

Mr. Trump was also worried about Cruz's eligibility. But unlike Grayson (who defends the interloper Hussein), Mr. Trump has been very strong on the subject of only people who are eligible being able to run for the presidency. Given the fact that he's gone after Obama; questioning his phony-baloney birth certificate.

Recently Mr. Trump brought up another issue that could have brought down the Cruz candidacy, had he been the nominee (if the GOP had stolen the nomination from Mr. Trump via a brokered convention).

Trump first made the inflammatory claim on the morning of May 3 on Fox and Friends: Cruz's "father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald being, you know, shot". The charge is lifted straight from the grocery store checkout tabloids, specifically a National Enquirer report based on photos of Oswald handing out pro-Fidel Castro pamphlets in New Orleans in 1963. Two photo experts told the Enquirer that another man in the grainy image bears a resemblance to young Rafael Cruz Sr. (Anatomy of a talking point: Donald Trump on the JFK assassination by Linda Qiu. PolitiFact 5/6/2016).

Note that this story is from the Leftwing smear site, PolitiFact. Here PolitiFact says "we rated Trump's claim Pants on Fire". But I trust Mr. Trump, given the fact that he is a man of high integrity and surely would not repeat an allegation such as this unless he was absolutely positive it was correct.

Which isn't to say that I think Ted Cruz should be held responsible for his father's role in the assassination of JFK (whatever that role was). There is the fact, however, that Ted is still very tight with his father... giving him a big hug after conceding the race to Mr. Trump (while elbowing his wife Heidi in the face).

And Ted's father Rafael was very active in his son's efforts to court Evangelical voters. Something that Mr. Trump commented on saying, "it's disgraceful that his father can go out and do that". And people are angry about it. Angry because Rafael lied about God being on his son Ted's side and saying that (if Ted is not prez) "the alternative could be the destruction of America".

Which is, of course, total bullcrap. The destruction of American will occur if Hillary is elected president. But the man to prevent that destruction is Donald J. Trump, NOT Ted Cruz! Frankly I think the DOJ should look into deporting both lying Ted and his lying father. Perhaps that might happen when Mr. Trump is elected president?

Image: Canadian-born Ted Cruz elbows his wife in the face while hugging a traitor who conspired to kill a US president (his Cuban-born father).

TLB #80

Liberal Media Focusing On Donald Trump's Penis While Ignoring The Fact That Our Current "President" Is A Gay Sex Addicted Muslim Pervert

Big surprise, huh? That the Liberal Media would lie about Mr. Trump having a small penis (when it is actually huge) while totally ignoring that fact that the so-called "president" (B. Hussein Obama) is a Muslim infiltrator who attended a Christian church lead by a pastor who hates American. Oh, and that he's a gay sex addicted pervert.

Don't believe me? Yeah, well one of his ex-secret service protectors tells the truth and spills the beans in a recent book.

Secret Service Agent Says Obama Is Muslim & Gay In New Tell-All Book (excerpt from a News Examiner article by Michael Davies) A former Secret Service agent... says it is time the public knows the real truth about our Commander in Chief, Barack Obama. Former agent, Paul Horner, in his new tell-all book "The Black House", reveals what goes on inside the White House when the news cameras are turned off. In an interview with NBC News, Horner told Senior Political Analyst Tom Downey that he is one-hundred-percent positive that President Obama is not only gay, but a radical Muslim as well. "Everyone on the inside knows that Obama is gay and a Muslim, it is common knowledge", Horner said. "I saw many men coming and going from Obama's room, at all hours. ...I am in no way homophobic, but Obama's insatiable lust for homosexual liaisons is like nothing I've ever witnessed. We're talking 10-15 partners in a single day". "I would say a good portion of the men, over fifty-percent, were Muslim... When no one was around, except his security, Obama couldn't wait to get out of his suit and into his Muslim tunic. He would wear it while praying to the prophet Muhammad throughout the day. During these prayer sessions he insisted that he not be disturbed". "He constantly made jokes about Americans, frequently referring to them as mongoloids and idiots. Christians were his favorite verbal punching bags. He has absolutely no respect for the Christian religion. I believe he actually hates Christians, and finds their ideology to be old fashioned and ignorant". (Link).

This is an ex-Secret Service man, so he is absolutely in a position to know the truth about our gay Muslim "president". You really think he'd lie about something so shocking? I don't. I mean, surely other Secret Service members (ex and current) would speak out if Mr. Horner was making this all up. You hear of any refutations? I sure haven't. No doubt the Obamaites think if they simply don't address these rumors people will say "that can't possibly be true".

Yet we have here (in Mr. Horner) a man who is saying that it IS true! Now, supposedly Snopes "debunked" this story, but I'm not buying it.

Snopes: [None] of these assertions about President Obama [are] true, nor did a former Secret Service agent named Paul Horner write a tell-all book titled The Black House. The NewsExaminer is a fake news web site, and NBC.com.co (which has no affiliation with the NBC network) is a shill fake news web site that reproduces content from NewsExaminer. (Link).

So it's all fake? If that's the case, then why is it that Amazon has a book titled The Black House available for sale? Yeah, according to Amazon the author of this book is Curtis R. Cochran, and not Paul Horner, but I'm guessing that Paul Horner, not being a professional writer, had this Cochran fellow write it up.

So, nice try Snopes, but your "debunk" fails. Apparently the Snopes idiots didn't think that anyone would check if such a book was actually available for sale. Which it is. I mean, I entered "The Black House Paul Horner" into the Amazon search box and this book came up. Also, if you look at the comments on News Examiner's site (attached to the excerpted article above) it's clear that numerous people have read the book. How could people have read it if it doesn't exist? Answer? Obviously they couldn't have.

You think the American people would have voted for Obama had they known this! Even African Americans (who support B. Hussein very strongly) would have rejected him if they had known the truth, I think. Sure, there are Black Muslims (The Nation of Islam), but there are also a lot of African Americans who are Christian. However, neither Christianity nor Islam are accepting of perversions like homosexuality, so I suspect that even Muslims wouldn't have voted for him.

But the Leftist Media clearly is. Accepting of perversion, that is. Which is why they're complicit in this cover up (their part being to not cover/ignore the truth about Obama). Instead they go after fine upstanding good Christian men like Mr. Trump. With made up stories about having a small penis (when his penis is actually humongous).

Disgusting (not Mr. Trump's big penis - that isn't what is disgusting. What's disgusting is that they lie about it being small. Also disgusting that they cover up the truth about our gay sex addicted America-hating Muslim "president").

TLB #75

Hillary Clinton More Likely To End Up In The Big House Than The White House

The following from the World Net Daily website concerning the criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information while Secretary of State.

Approximately 100 FBI special agents are assigned to an investigation that will determine if the former secretary of state violated a subsection of the Espionage Act related to "gross negligence" in handling government documents. That investigation also has a second track, which is to determine whether co-mingling of the Clinton Foundation and State Department business violated public corruption laws. (Source).

As our future president Donald J. Trump noted "Hillary Clinton could face significant jail time – up to 20 years in prison – as a consequence of storing classified information on her now-infamous private email server".

The crimes of Hillary Clinton amount to "Watergate on steroids" according to the future POTUS (in agreement with Bob Woodward). But, unlike with Nixon, President Trump likely will NOT pardon her. What's most shameful about this situation is that General Petraeus' life was destroyed "for doing 5 percent of what she did".

There is the possibility that Hillary could use her connections to escape justice, just like she did when she murdered Vince Foster. A prospect I find quite alarming. After decades of lawlessness it is WAY beyond time to put this criminal behind bars. Yet (some) Americans are considering sending her to the White House? Unfreaking believable!

But don't forget that these same Americans previously sent a Constitutionally ineligible Black man to the White House. Just because he was black. Ignoring the fact that he was born in Kenya. Sure, the Obama machine probably stole a LOT of votes (and flipped the election)... but there were still some people who voted for him.

Hopefully, following the disastrous and shameful Obama presidency (I mean, the dude couldn't have even managed one Walmart!) the American people will have the sense to elect the only man who can make America great again. And vote for him in such great numbers that any cheating on the other side will not be enough to steal the presidency (a 3rd time).

TLB #68

Sick Liberal Pervert Leo DiCraprio Stars In Film Where He Is Homo Raped By A Bear

The following from the Drudge Report website concerning an upcoming movie from Liberal Hollyweird.

The new movie Revenant features a shocking scene of a wild bear raping Leo DiCaprio! The explicit moment from Oscar winning director Alejandro Inarritu has caused maximum controversy in early screenings. ... The story of rural survivalism and revenge reaches new violent levels for a mainstream film. The bear flips Leo over and thrusts and thrusts during the explicit mauling. He is raped - twice! (Source).

Now, I have seen other stories on the net in which the studio responsible for this filth denies the homo rape scene... but I'm not buying it. Has Drudge issued a retraction? If so, I haven't seen it. Given the fact that this movie hasn't opened yet, perhaps the scene in question will be edited out before it hits theaters?

Who knows? I do know that once again the Liberal media is saying that a fine Conservative news source is lying. Frankly I am sick of it. We all know that it's the Liberal media that lies more than Hillary Clinton.

This is why I can report that I will NOT be going to see this pornographic trash! With or without the gay rape scene, this movie was still directed by the same fool responsible for Birdman, a 2014 film that "garnered wide acclaim and numerous accolades including Academy Award nominations" despite being terrible.

I stupidly sat through this stupidity recently (during a free movie channel preview) only to find that there was no ending! The main character (played by Michael Keaton) might have jumped to his death from a hospital window, or perhaps he actually flew away. I won't try to explain as doing so isn't worth the effort. The bottom line is that Birdman was one of the dumbest movies I've ever seen. Take my advice and avoid any film directed by Alejandro Inarritu.

But, despite how bad it was, that didn't stop Hollyweird from heaping praise upon it.

By the way, this outdoes Hollyweird's obsession with everything gay and unnatural. Two other films I've heard about recently that focus on perversity include Carol (features a lesbian relationship between Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara) and The Danish Girl (which "stars Eddie Redmayne as Lili Elbe, one of the first known recipients of sex reassignment surgery").

All this following the SCOTUS decision to legalize the unnatural "union" of two people of the same sex. And, now that this sickness is being referred to as "marriage", Hollyweird thinks it's OK for them to embrace wickedness by making it central to the plot in many more movies.

Which is why I'm thinking that this bear raping scene being in "Revenant" (as reported by Drudge) is likely factual. Because, now that the SCOTUS has let this genie out of the bottle, perversions are becoming the norm. And Hollyweird is no longer content with perversion involving man or woman alone. Logically the next step includes other perversions such as bestiality.

Obviously Liberals are to blame for this. They wish to send America to hell in a handbasket, and getting the public to accept more and more perversity is a part of that plan. Me, I'm praying that our next president is a Republican. This being yet another example of how having a Liberal in the White House leads to bad things. What we have here is an example of evil percolating down from the top.

TLB #67

President Trump Will Obliterate ISIS by Bombing The Shit Out Of Them

The question is why isn't our Muslim president doing this already? Actually, I jest. The reason is that he's a Muslim and on the side of ISIS!

This also explains why B. Hussein wants to import a bunch of ISIS fighters under the guise of them being "refugees". No, Fox News analyst Ralph Peters, B. Hussein isn't a #pussy, he's a manchurian president who is taking down American from the inside.

That is why 2017 can't get here fast enough for me. I eagerly await the day that president Donald J. Trump takes the oath of office. Then immediately gets to work building the wall between us and Mexico to keep out all the criminal rapists (and has Mexico pay for it). And begins deporting all the "refugee" terrorists admitted under B. Hussein.

Yes, it is true that Mr. Trump has not laid out any detailed plans regarding HOW he intends to get Mexico to pay for that wall. Nor has he said how deporting people based on their religion is constitutional. But if he did the Progressives could develop counter-measures to stop President Trump. So he has wisely decided to keep the details on the downlow.

No doubt that, when conducting his many business deals, Trump does not give away how he is going to one up those he negotiates with. The Progressives try to make it look like Trump is just BSing us, but we know (based on his highly successful business career), that Trump knows what he's doing.

Which is why I'll definitely be voting Trump, and If you don't want America to be defeated by ISIS you will too.

TLB #66

"Death To America!" Says Prez B. Hussein With Deal That Allows Syrian Terrorists (Masquerading As "Refugees") To Enter America By The Thousands!

I don't know how there can be any doubt now that our illegitimate Kenyan Muslim president is actively working against the interests of the United States! This time the unelected/ineligible US "president" B. Hussein is bringing thousands of potential terrorists (which the traitorous Left calls refugees), into the country against the will of the American people!

Yes, many state governors are saying N-O, but others are saying that, yes, they really want a Paris-style attack! Although I doubt that the constituents of these insane Leftist governors want this. At least the next time these "death to America" governors come up for election the electorate will install 50 Republicans as governors?

As Ann Coulter said (via tweet) when Paris was attacked, "Donald Trump was elected president tonight". By which she meant the seeds were sown for Mr. Trump's landslide election. Now that B. Hussein has demanded the US accept Syrian "refugee" terrorists? How can Mr. Trump NOT be a lock for president?

I mean, why THE HELL would the voters send another Democrat to the White House given that the current Democrat is currently working (from the inside) to bring down America? And by "another Democrat" I mean Hillary Rodham Clinton. Bernie Sanders, the Commie Socialist in second place, won't get the nomination. A lot of the Blacks (and others who like free stuff) might be willing to vote for comrade Sanders, but with no Billionaires backing him up he doesn't stand a chance. Hillary, who has the big money Liberal fascists on her side, has the nomination locked up, I think.

No, I think it's looking like a virtually certainly that our next president will be Donald Trump. That is, unless the B. Hussein election stealing machine manages to steal the election for Hillary. A president Hillary Clinton would continue to import Syrian "refugee" terrorist by the TENS of thousands!

Me? I'm with Ann Coulter and Donald Trump. If Trump is elected he will immediately begin deporting the Syrian "refugee" terrorists in addition to the Mexican illegal alien murders and rapers.

TLB #64

"Death To America!" Says B. Hussein Obama With Deal That Allows Iran To Get Nukes!

I don't know how there can be any doubt now that our illegitimate Kenyan Muslim president is actively working against the interests of the United States! Not only is B. Hussein "marching Israel to door of the oven", as candidate Huckabee pointed out, but he's bringing death to America as well. According to the clueless John Kerry, Iranians don't actually say "death to America", they only chant it. Seriously, he said this! (Source).

Texas Republican Ted Poe, of the House Foreign Relations Committee, in response to Kerry's idiocy, said "Well, I kind of take that to mean that they want us dead". Indeed they do, which is why the Hussein deal that "virtually guarantees" Iran will acquire nuclear weapons (according to Jenny Beth Martin, the CEO and co-founder of Tea Party Patriots) must be stopped!

The following is from one of America's top Conservative news sites...

Even top Democrats have come out against it. Senators Chuck Schumer of NY and Bob Menendez of NJ, both plan to vote for an upcoming Senate bill disapproving of the deal. J.B. Pritzker, a lifelong Democrat who chaired Hillary's 2008 campaign, wrote last week: "Regrettably, the Iran deal fails to meet these goals and raises the prospects for war... By legitimizing Iran's nuclear program, removing the pressure of economic sanctions and allowing it to obtain conventional weapons and ballistic missiles, this agreement makes the prospect for war more likely, not less". President Bill Clinton's CIA director, James Woolsey, also wrote last week: "Congress must stop President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran. The most important reason — Iran can threaten the existence of the United States by making an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack using a single nuclear weapon". (Source).

Say what you will about the Democrats (their socialism will destroy America if we allow it), but no democrat president has ever worked directly with a muslim America-hating regime in order to HELP them acquire nukes with which to attack us and Israel!

Instead of being allowed to push this "deal" forward, B. Hussein should be arrested, tried for treason, and executed as an enemy of American... In this Conservative's opinion. Although that most likely will not happen.

Hopefully this "deal" can be stopped with help from the few sane democrats who aren't falling in line behind B. Hussein. Why are they selling out America, BTW? Do they feel they need to go along with B. Hussein because he's their president (and gullibly believe this "deal" is actually in our best interest), or do they hate America (and wish to bring it down) as much as B. Hussein?

TLB #62

Why America, Why?

In 2008 Hussein was just the former community organizer and junior Senator without a past. In 2012 he was running on his record of accomplishing nothing. All the flowery hope and change B.S. shouldn't have meant a thing. Romney blew it, even though his victory should have been as easy as shooting fish in a barrel.

TLB #61

Traitorous Prez Hussein Giving Aid & Comfort To Terrorists Re: Bergdahl Swap

Barlowe Bayer is an extremely Conservative individual who voted for Willard Mittens Romney in the last election. Although he only did so because Mittens was the better of two bad options. Although the two options were not equally bad.

Hussein was, BY FAR, the worse of the two bad options. We know that even more today (that Hussein was the worse option), what with this Nixonian use of the IRS to target his political enemies, his lying about Benghazi and (most recently) unconstitutionally going around congress and trading 5 Taliban terrorists for 1 scumbag deserter.

For these reasons Barlowe says president Hussein should be impeached. On this topic Barlowe is in complete agreement with the expert opinion of an ex-military man named William Boykin who says President Obama is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors in regards to the Bergdahl swap.

Boykin also says "Jews are the problem" and the "cause of all the problems in the world" and "that President Obama identifies with and supports Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood".

Now, in regards to those three assertions Barlowe is only in agreement with the third one (Hussein identifies with and supports Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood). The first two anti-Semitic sounding comments were picked up by a hot mic. Boykin did not intend them to be heard by anyone except the individual he was speaking with.

Given this fact, Barlowe will respect the Lieutenant General's privacy and forget about the seemingly anti-Semitic comments. If Boykin decides to "come out" and declare himself to be an anti-Semite that is one thing. Until then Barlowe will assume he is not.

In any case, what I'm discussing here is Hussein's traitorous sidestepping of congress in releasing Taliban terrorists from Gitmo. And in exchange from someone who CHOSE to leave his post (deserted). Barlowe is utterly disgusted by these actions and believes Hussein should be removed from office for this reason (one among many).

And then be shipped off to Gitmo himself. Yeah, that is a complete fantasy, I know. But just because there is zero chance of it happening does not mean it isn't EXACTLY what the terrorist-sympathizing Muslim deserves.

As for this Bergdahl wuss, the same goes for him. Lt. General Boykin believes Bergdahl "needs to spend the rest of his life in prison at a minimum" and Barlowe agrees. Send him to Gitmo, or just put a bullet in his head.

Now some may argue that "the 5 Taliban detainees had to be released soon, no matter what [because] when wars end, prisoners taken custody must be released". And these people may also point out that the "5 Gitmo detainees were almost all members of the Taliban [and] none were facing charges in either military or civilian courts for their actions".

To this Barlowe says - why the hell were they not facing charges? Why the hell have we not already tried and executed these 5 Taliban scumbag terrorists who will no doubt return to the battlefield after they are released?

Furthermore, why did this not already happen under former prez Bush? Barlowe has no idea, although he is inclined to believe the reason has something to do with a failure of leadership from the supposed Commander-in-Chief. Both of them... the ex-CIC and the present CIC (Bush and Hussein).

Although, in the case of Hussien, his failures, I am positive, are intentional... because he's a Muslim himself and sympathizes with his "brothers in arms" who are valiantly fighting to bring down the "Great Satan".

Which is why Hussein MUST be impeached. Or should be impeached.

But will he be? I doubt it. At the very least we need to elect a Republican president in 2016. If not... well, we're screwed. America will descend further into Socialism and our Nation (as we know it) will be lost.

TLB #57

The Maker Blues

As you can see from my lack of posts here, I have largely retired from blogging. No commenting on the blogs of others, either. I lost interest and decided my time would be better spent on other activities. Work, mainly. Being a Maker and working hard to earn enough to live comfortably while, at the same time, having a too-large amount of money stolen to support all the Takers that voted for Obama is not an easy task.

When will the Republican Party get their act together and get serious about rebuilding so that they have a chance the next time out? Then again, perhaps they are relying on Obama to do all the work for them? Once the economy crashes again, then the public may be forced to accept the fact that a welfare state is unsustainable. But, even though that will probably require a economic depression, I fear it is the only way this country will ever wake up.

Unfortunately that will likely mean mass poverty, starvation and even rioting of the ignorant masses who think they should be given a free ride paid for by those of us who are working our butts off and using our brains to get ahead. Barack Obama has demonized us productive people to the point where the idiots who vote Democrat think we (those of us whose work keeps the economy going) are the bad guys.

Frankly, I find it truly sickening. When the economy collapses due to their greed and laziness I too will suffer. That is why I'm trying to accumulate as much wealth as possible before it all goes to hell. Of course an investment strategy will be key to surviving the coming depression, as inflation will likely make any cash one might hold worth considerably less.

So far my investments have been doing well, providing a decent rate of return. I only worry about getting out before the stock market crashes. My sources say that around the time of the next presidential election is when the policies of Obama may cause the house of cards which is our economy to come tumbling down. I fear that day, although I am planning for it and working to see that I have enough to make it though.

Many of you Takers will likely bite the dust, but I surely will not shed a tear. You will only have your lack of foresight and selfishness to blame for your predicament then. You should have voted for Mitt Romney instead of going for the guy who promised you free stuff paid for by those of us who actually work.

TLB #50

The Big Promotion

So the boss man calls me into his office and sits me down. Then he says, "Barlowe, you've been with the company for a long time. You're a hard worker and you've produced a lot of profit for this firm. Long story short, I want to offer you the big promotion. Needless to say, a substantial raise comes with the promotion. And the corner office too. The downside is that you'll have to take on a lot more responsibility and work more hours. But I have confidence that you can handle it".

Now, being a shrewd negotiator I didn't jump at the offer, but first had him lay out all the details. How much was the "big raise"? No, it wasn't enough. I had been entertaining offers from other firms, and the boss man's offer fell short. So we negotiated a bit and he increased his offer. I think when retirement time comes I will be sitting mighty pretty. But the increased hours and responsibility leave little time for frivolities like blogging (I was kidding about "going off the grid").

The real reason for my absence is that I've been quite busy getting up to speed on my new responsibilities. I've had to reorganize an entire department as well as call a few under performing team members into my office. Unfortunately some of them had to be let go, which means more work for me interviewing replacements. But now that my house is in order I think the future for my department is looking mighty good. Meaning I am anticipating increased profits going forward.

No doubt the boss man will be very pleased, which means I should be able to negotiate for an nice salary bump the next time my evaluation rolls around. That would be on top of the one I just received. Us productive people are in high demand, what with approximately 47 percent of the country contributing nothing to the kitty, but instead pulling resources out. Yes, people like me have to work harder to support the deadbeats, and (for that reason) I considered not accepting the promotion.

It thoroughly sickens me to think that a good portion of my hard earned salary will be distributed as hand-outs to Obamaites who spend all day smoking weed and watching TV. I work harder and the government takes more? Yeah, the raise pushed me up into a higher tax bracket, so that's more of MY MONEY going to the welfare state. These people should get jobs instead of Obamabucks for nothing.

But that is why they voted for him. He got re-elected and they get their payoff. And it is people like me that have to pay for it! Anyway, I wrote a few posts before everything happened that prevented me from blogging (writing posts or commenting on the blogs of my blogging friends dmarks and Will Hart). I'll probably post those (at least) over the next few days or weeks (seeing as they are already written). After that, who knows? I'm going to be pretty busy with my new responsibilities.

TLB #47, BS #2.

How Dumb Does Barack Obama Think We Are?

Notice that, in response to all the scandals that plague his administration, prez Hussein claims he knows nothing? Neither he nor Attorney General Eric Holder knew the ATF had decided to arm the Mexican drug cartels. He says he did not know the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was a terrorist attack linked to Al Qaeda instead of a spontaneous uprising linked to a protest over a video – even though whistle blowers testifying before Congress say they told him it was a terrorist attack.

Eric Holder claims he didn't know about the decision to seize AP phone records. Hussein claims he did not know the IRS was targeting Conservative groups. Not until he saw the news reports.

What is this guy, a figurehead who holds no actual power, or the leader of the free world? Does anyone in this incompetent administration actually make any decisions or stay in the loop in regards to anything for which they are supposedly responsible? Just how dumb does the Hussein administration think we are?

If you're like me you aren't buying these incredibly lame protests of not knowing what the hell is going on. You know the entire Hussein Administration is lying to us. And they've got to know how transparent their lies are becoming. They are so desperate that they'd rather the public believe they are unbelievably incompetent then realize how corrupt they actually are.

What's with these delusional Liberals in complete denial regarding their savior's fall from grace? Is it that they just can't wrap their brains around the fact that Hussein lied to them? That the first Black president is also one of the worst commanders in chief ever to serve? And, NO, Libs, I intend no racism by making that statement. It is just an observation of the obvious.

Regardless of whether the far-lefties continue to defend the indefensible, the American people are waking up. A recent poll reveals that HALF of America wants this crooked liar removed from office, including almost 28 percent of Democrats.

Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies (the company that conducted the poll) says, "the appetite is growing for impeachment proceedings. It is too early to say it is time for those proceedings to start, but it's now possible to see that day on the far horizon". Sorry Libs.

TLB #44

Obama And The I-Word (If Only We Could Recall Him)

The Liberals tried and failed to recall my governor, Scott Walker. They thought they could win but what they didn't realize is that even Democrat voters knew we needed to reign in the greed of the public sector unions. No doubt that quite a few teachers, firefighters and cops voted for Walker, knowing it would cost them but willing to give up what they knew they didn't deserve. Certainly not when the rest of us with private sector jobs are still suffering under the Obama economy.

With Obama, however, there is a stark contrast. Obama, unlike Walker, isn't doing what is necessary to get the country back on the right fiscal path. Instead he spends our money to buy votes and campaign contributions for himself and his fellow Democrats.

The corruption of this administration is becoming much more clear in it's second term, what with the lies and cover up concerning Benghazi, using the IRS to target political opponents, and the tyrannical seizing of records from reporters. There are many more scandals of course (listed at the beginning of my previous post) but it is these three that are generating some serious talk of impeachment.

If only we could recall him, I think many Americans who voted for Obama the last time out would not just go with whatever candidate the Democrats put up in Obama's place (Biden or Hillary) - but would acknowledge they were wrong in not electing Romney when they had the chance. Certainly Romney would get the vote of independents and conservative Democrats who deeply regret voting for the miserable liar who occupies the White House.

Alas, the Constitution does not allow for the recall of a president. The best we could hope for would be a president Biden if the Republicans retook the Senate in the midterms. Unless it could be proven Biden was in on the lying and we impeached him as well. That, however, would be historically unprecedented (and therefore quite unlikely).

Still, there could be some benefits to impeaching Hussein, namely slowing down (or even halting) his Socialist agenda of spending money we don't have and making the "rich" he vilifies pay for (some of) it (while borrowing the rest from China). What do you think? Should we impeach or should we not impeach?

I say yes, but wait until we get nearer to the midterms so we can use it as ammunition to take out his Democrat allies and win the Senate. When, exactly that would mean impeachment proceedings should begin I do not know, but I'm sure the Republicans are on top of it (or I hope they are).

TLB #43

The Tyrant Obama Orders Death From Above Via Drone

The issue with his birth certificate, budget-busting healthcare "reform", an attempt to classify CO2 as a pollutant, more thievery in the form of increased taxes, refusing to defend DOMA, an attempt to weaken the second amendment, the Benghazi cover up, and now the scandalous revelation that Hussein's IRS targeted Conservative groups... certainly one can not deny that Hussein's presidency is the worst since (at least) Jimmy Carter.

In particular the ability to execute American citizens as he sees fit gives Libertarian John Myers of the Personal Liberty Digest serious cause for concern. Mr. Myers warns of Hussein's "secret army" that allows Hussein to act as "executioner against Americans he sees as his enemy".

Myers points out that Liberal author Jeremy Scahill says "Obama has been granted a blank check to vastly expand drone strikes while blatantly ignoring the Constitution by denying habeas corpus". Yes, Hussein has only executed two American citizens, SO FAR, but "when you stop denying one subset of Americans due process, you are on a slippery slope toward eliminating other Americans whom the President and his secret cabal classify as enemies".

Frankly, I think it a good think when the lives of terrorist scum like al-Awlaki are ended via hellfire missile, but there needs to be some checks and balances on the process. Congress should be involved and who is on the "kill list" should not be in the hands of the executive only!

If this blatant ignoring of the Constitution were being done by a Republican president the hypocrite Liberals would be screaming impeachment, yet their savior Obama does it and not a peep?

TLB #42

The Scandal Predicted to Bring Down the Barack Hussein Obama Administration

Barack Hussein Obama will not serve out his second term. Instead he will be forced to resign or be impeached and leave office in disgrace. I read about this prediction on a well known Conservative News site. Several Republicans were quoted as believing it will be the Benghazi cover up that will be the undoing of Obama.

Frankly I'm not so sure. Yes, I think there was a cover up, and yes, I believe it could be of a magnitude that removing Hussein from office would be entirely appropriate -- but will it actually happen? Only one president has ever resigned from office. Two others were impeached, but they were not removed. Richard Nixon said if a president does it, then it is legal.

People considered that to be an arrogant statement, but I think for (the most part) it is true (not necessarily that anything a president does is legal, but that he can get away with it). It was only because Nixon recorded his misdeeds, and then did not destroy those tapes, that he made his removal from office a certainty. If he had not resigned he would have been bounced out by an impeachment and conviction.

According to the Washington Post, the "U.S. Embassy officials in Tripoli, some 600 miles away, tried unsuccessfully to get the Pentagon to scramble fighter jets" and that "the embassy also was unable to get permission to deploy four U.S. Special Operations troops in Benghazi during the attack".

The question is why did Hussein allow these attacks to continue without responding? Was the Hussein administration's failure to act due to their incompetence or was there some other reason? Did they actually order those who could have responded to stand down?

Greg Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission in Libya, says, "Special Forces personnel were planning to board a C-130 flight at around 6am local time on Sept. 12 but [were told] "you can't go now, you don't have authority to go...".

I don't know about you, but that sounds quite damning to me. A commenter on the "Atlas Shrugs" message board has a theory regarding the stand down order -- he says, "the corruption of this administration pales in comparison to any other scandal. ...to have a Muslim President in office so soon after 9/11 is by design and no accident".

What do you think about this theory? Is it conspiracy theory nonsense from a nutjob, or a very real possibility? I'm leaning toward the later.

TLB #41

Taxacrat Mugging Attempt

We all knew that sooner or later the tax-and-spend types in Congress were going to try to pass legislation assessing a fee to purchase online. For Democrats, of course, there is no new tax that they do not love. Unfortunately some traitorous Senate Republicans joined in (today) and helped the Dems pass a bill to allow states to tax internet sales.

Hopefully the Republican controlled House will reject this outrageous mugging of the middle class. Prez Hussein got his tax increase on the so-called wealthy - now they are going after ordinary working folks?! I don't know about you, but I'm steamed. Especially that Senate Republicans would go along with this shake down of strapped everyday citizens. They are supposed to hold the line and stop the Dems when they attempt to pick our pockets.

It is true that you're supposed to self-report online purchases and pay the tax when you file your state income tax returns, but does anyone actually comply? Maybe happy to "contribute" Liberals (those who aren't living off entitlements and actually have an income), but I'd bet even the Liberal (hypocrite) compliance rate is low. I sure as hell do not divulge what I buy online to my state tax collectors. It is none of their fricking business.

If this bill passes taxes will be assessed and collected automatically by online retailers (and passed on to the states), so you'll have no choice but to pay up. CBS News reports that "some states have sales taxes as high as 7 percent, plus city and county taxes that can push the combined rate even higher". Apparently they think we're made of money!

Congress continues to spend without restraint knowing they can simply pass legislation to steal more from us already over-taxed citizens. Instead of balancing the books as they should. Additionally, as the CBS article warns, "States could audit out-of-state businesses, impose liens on their property and, ultimately, sue them in state court" - so this legislation gives even more power to the government to harass businesses by piling on onerous regulations. Does anyone else find this extremely troubling?

One commenter to the CBS News story put it best when he described Congress as "a mob of self-serving, greedy, corrupt, egomaniacs who could care less about the affects their actions or inactions have on the people they are supposed to represent".

TLB #40

Barack Hussein Obama Liberal Drug Pusher

Libertarians, while completely wrong when it comes to social issues, do have it correct when it comes to fiscal matters. According to a recent article by Libertarian Wayne Allen Root, Prez Hussein is like a drug pusher, addicting the population to entitlements.

In his commentary Wayne says, "He has addicted the whole country to welfare, food stamps, disability, unemployment, free meals at school, housing allowances and free healthcare. He's turned almost the whole population into addicts with their hands out".

Wayne is absolutely right, although I'd disagree that the addicts are "almost the whole population". The people with their hands out are the 47 percent Mitt Romney referred to in that private speech he gave to donors that a Liberal operative illegally recorded. But the Liberals and Liberal suckers rejected Romney's advice that America enter rehab. Instead they voted for the candidate who promised to continue feeding their addiction.

Romney told the addicts he was going to cut them off. He told them he'd grow the economy by getting rid of oppressive regulations and cutting the taxes of job creators. Under a Romney presidency everyone who was willing to work hard would be able to provide for themselves and wouldn't need the Liberal entitlements.

But Romney was vilified for telling the truth, and it cost him dearly. The Liberal parasites and leaches don't like it when their victims complain. Getting the voters hooked on freebies from the Government (that the productive sector of society pays for) is the only way Democrats can win!

Which is why Hussein the drug pusher continues his call for the job creators and successful individuals to be taxed more and more. Someone has to pay for all the free drugs (entitlements) the Democrats hand out like candy. But we all know that addicts (unless they get clean) eventually die. This is the path America is headed down under the Liberals.

Barack Hussein Obama is killing our economy by enabling the Liberal druggies addicted to entitlements. America needs to detox. It will be hard, but we'll come out stronger on the other end. Unfortunately the healing can't begin until we get our fiscal house in order, and that isn't going to happen with Hussein "leading" the nation.

TLB #39

Is Barack Hussein Obama an Illegitimate President?

There are those who believe the last election was stolen. That massive voter fraud swung it in Obama's favor and that Romney actually won. I think these people are definitely on to something. But, as history has shown us, once a president is elected (or he appears to have been elected), nothing can be done to undo the announced election results.

So Obama, legitimate or not, won't be ejected from office. His "win" won't be overturned because nobody is investigating the voter fraud issue. Republicans continue to work to see that it's reduced in the future, but past voter fraud will stand. Clearly Obama'a presidency could be illegitimate in that his win was due to voter fraud (that will never be investigated and thus never proven), but what about the "natural born citizen" issue? That issue was resolved when Obama (under pressure) FINALLY released his Hawaiian long form birth certificate, right?

Not so fast kemosabe! The Hawaiian birth certificate that Hussein released may have fooled the Liberal media, but others say it's a forgery. CBS News in Arizona reported on an investigation initiated by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and they say Joe's investigators "confirmed" the document was created using Photoshop (see video below).

Snopes does a pretty good job "debunking" the "created in Photoshop" charge, but Snopes is the same site that "debunked" the allegation that Al Gore claimed to have invented the internet. They based their conclusion on some bullpucky about "create" and "invent" not having the same meaning - but go to any dictionary website and you'll find that the words are synonyms.

Also, Wikipedia notes that the site's creator David Mikkelson "has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias". Maybe their defense of Al Gore using a nonsense argument about synonyms having different meanings could have something to do with these "Liberal bias" accusations?

On the other hand, the Snopes page links to a Fox New article! I suppose this was done to convince Right-wingers? "Look Right-winger, we're linking to FOX NEWS"!! But check this out - if you Google the name of the Photoshop expert, "Jean-Claude Tremblay", one of the articles that comes up on top is, "Fox News expert denies he claimed birth certificate legit".

Tremblay (the Fox News expert) says, "the network must retract the story, [because] it deliberately misquoted him". Tremblay says his findings don't prove the authenticity of the document one way or the other, but Fox News refuses to allow him to correct their story. As a result Tremblay feels "anger verging on disdain" and no longer trusts Fox News. I guess that blows the Snopes "debunking" out of the water. This expert's analysis went from "absolutely legit" to "can't say one way or the other". Question is, why would Fox News put forward a story that misrepresents what the Photoshop expert said?

The newspaper announcements that some cite as "proof" have also been questioned. Both of the two papers that ran the birth announcements said their information came from the state Department of Health and the "certificates of live birth". But these certificates require no proof that the child was actually born in Hawaii; instead they are issued if the child's parents have "declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child".

Furthermore, a neighbor living next to the address where the birth announcement says the Obamas lived can't recall that a White woman who gave birth to a black baby ever lived there, and an investigator looking into the matter discovered the house was owned by an "Orland S. and Thelma S. (Young) Lefforge, both of whom are deceased".

In conclusion I must say that (for me, at least), the question of where Barack Hussein Obama was actually born is still unknown - but the claim that he was born in Hawaii seems incredibly suspect. If he was actually born in Hawaii you'd think there wouldn't be all these questions. For me, the fact that there are all these questions point to a cover-up. And why cover-up where he was actually born unless he was born outside the United States?

Back to the question regarding Barack Hussein Obama's presidency and it's legitimacy. Is he a legitimate president? Was he legitimately elected? Is he Constitutionally eligible to serve? I say the facts seem to strongly suggest that he is illegitimate for two reasons. First of all, his "win" was accomplished via voter fraud, and secondly - he wasn't even eligible to run in the first place!

TLB #38