Confirmed! George Soros Stole Alabama Election From Roy Moore For Doug Jones

In my last post I wondered if the election in Alabama had been stolen. I mean, would the citizens of Red Red Alabama REALLY send an evil pro-baby-murder Leftist to the Senate? Instead of a good Christian man like the honorable Judge Roy Moore? Yes, there were allegations of pedophila against Moore, but the allegations were 100% FALSE.

In fact, the lying sluts who came forward and LIED about Roy Moore groping them were PROVEN to have lied. Beverly Young Nelson admitted that she forged Moore's inscription in her yearbook. Additionally, it was revealed that the fake media organization known as the "Washington Post" PAID women to make up bogus stories about Moore (he should sue their asses!).

I was confident that the good White Christian voters of Alabama would see through this bullshit and get out and vote for Roy Moore. Instead the "news" media is reporting that the BLACK vote was larger than ever and that pushed the anti-Life Jones over the top. Narrowly.

So narrowly that Roy Moore did not concede. Not all the votes are counted and he might yet win (*fingers crossed*). But was the Black vote (people who vote solely on the issue of government handouts and freebies) ACTUALLY as large as reported, or is there something fishy going on here? Well, I looked into it, and what I found is that, YES, the election was almost certainly stolen. Explaining why Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill says he is investigating concerns of voter fraud.

Aaccording to Father Mark Hodges of LifeSiteNews (pro-life organization), "Doug Jones didn't win the Alabama election. George Soros and his media allies did". As revealed by Mr. Hodges, "Highway 31", a George Soros funded anti-Moore superPAC "created and bought time for ads smearing Moore with long-disproved accusations, such as the slander that he was... banned from the Gadsden Mall".

Soros' SuperPAC, in addition to registering felons to vote (5 to 10 thousand murders, rapists and other violent criminals), bussed in out-of-state Blacks to vote in Alabama (comitting multiple felonies!).

I am hearing rumors that black voters from MS were encouraged to cross over into AL and vote. Anyone else hearing this? Anything to it? That might explain the 30% turnout higher than population percentage. Just reporting the rumor.

— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) December 13, 2017

Bill Mitchell is a pro-Trump patriot and founder of YourVoiceRadio, a podcast and a YouTube channel. The Weekly Standard reported (prior to the 2016 POTUS election), "Mitchell's highest calling is unskewing the polls to mete out the hidden truth of an inevitable Trump win".

So, as we all know, Trump won the election. Mitchell also predicted that Moore would win. On 11/26/2017 Mitchell tweeted "Moore will win easily. AL gave Trump a 28 point margin in 2016". Are we to believe that Mitchell accurately predicted Trump's win, but was so wrong about Moore? Or is it more likely that the Dems (funded by Soros) cheated?

Yeah, the Alabama election was CLEARLY stolen. If you don't see it you need to get to a proctologist ASAP to have your head extracted from your asshole. The dishonest D'rats will stop at nothing to derail Trump's MAGA agenda. Because they hate America and do NOT want it to be great again. Let's pray Moore gets the recount he's calling for and it is proven that he actually won.

TLB #94

Voters Of Alabama Demand More Abortions!

With the election of the lover of baby murder, Doug Jones, elected to the US Senate, the people of Alabama have made their choice clear. That choice? More abortion. Moore (ironically?) is opposed to abortion. Yet the voters chose Jones, sending a message. That message? "We love abortion".

Hard to believe. The electorate of RED RED Alabama went for a pro-baby murder like Jones? Maybe the election was stolen? Moore has yet to concede, and is seeking a recount. Yet HOW could it be close enough for Obama to steal (for Jones) unless a near majority of the voters of Alabama LOVE abortion?

I don't know. I was very pleased with the election of Donald John Trump. America is finally back on the right track. With principled Christian men like Kris Kobach working hard to take the vote away from minority and "immigrant" cheaters (double and illegal voters) Mr. Trump vanquished the evil Hildabeest. But now this????

Satan's candidate Jones won, and you know that HIGH on his agenda will be increasing abortions pronto! "I love killing babies" Doug Jones exclaimed in his victory speech. "This is a great victory for lovers of murdering babies. My master Satan thanks the voters of Alabama. Now on to Washington so I can get down to the hard work of writing legislation to make abortion on demand more readily available. And government funded".

Or, that's what Jones would have said had he told the truth. Instead he referenced the false allegations of "child molestering" the Left drummed up agaisnt the Christian candidate Moore. A reporter for the WP (the lying media's flagship) named Bernie Bernstein solicited (and offered cash payments) for lying whores to make false charges against Roy Moore. I've heard the audio.

The WP, of course, denied that anyone in their employ was named "Bernie Bernstein" or that anyone who worked for them recorded the robocall. I call bullshit on their denials. This is how they got the women who have made fake charges of groping against Moore to "come forward". They obviously paid them off. Being a good Christian man, Roy Moore would never sexually assault, grope, or otherwise assault a child! The very idea is preposterous.

I think it's more likely that Doug Jones molested kids. Male kids. And that we haven't heard about it because the WP sat on the story/covered it up. I have no proof, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if it was 100% true. Because someone as evil as Jones wouldn't be content to only murder babies.

TLB #93

Victory For Murderers At Planned Parenthood Thanks To Liberals On Supreme Court

the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday 6/27/2016 in a 5 to 3 decision (Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt) that the legalized slaughter shall continue. Not that the Texas law they struck down stopped it, but it did slow down the holocaust of the unborn... a little. How these ghouls can sleep at night I have no idea. I would think the nightmares would be unbearable. They should be unbearable.

And all of those laws required was that clinics meet hospital standards and doctors obtain admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. In the interest of protecting women's health and raising the standards of abortion care which is dangerously low. Now (following this bad ruling) abortion access is expected to grow across the nation! (NewsMax reports).

In my strong opinion any society that systematically aborts its young is barbaric... as well as insane and Satanic. By the way, what about prosecuting PP for illegally selling baby parts? Time to shut down that evil organization for good, I say. And send those who illegally profited from the sale of aborted babies to prison!

Regarding this ruling Senator Ted Cruz (Canadian representing Texas) said "the Supreme Court sided with abortion extremists who care more about providing abortion-on-demand than they do protecting women's health". Yeah, while I did not support Ted re his presidential aspirations (given that, as a Canadian-born individual, he was ineligible), I do agree with him that this decision being not good. It is, in fact, EVIL.

Another reason Donald Trump MUST be elected our next president! PLEASE, if you care about the lives of the unborn, you must vote Trump this November. While both Secretary Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (who is STILL a candidate for the Democratic nomination?) praised the decision as a "victory for women"?!

Only Trump (a Godly man) will appoint a replacement SCOTUS judge that will FINALLY end the legalized baby murdering. Frankly I simply do not understand why anyone would even consider voting Democratic! Don't these Democratic voters know they're damning their souls to hell when they pull the lever for the Democrat? Some of them think they're "Christian" (I've heard). But it is a fact that when they cast their vote for Hillary, Satan will cheer.

Which is why I pray to God that Donald Trump will be our next president. But are there enough sane Christians? I don't know. Surely there was a LOT of cheating to get our current Muslim president "elected", but many did turn out for him. Including (a large percentage of) Blacks who were fooled into voting for him. Just because he's Black they overlooked the fact that he's a Muslim, a homosexual, and a supporter of killing children in the womb?!

And now they're going for Hillary, even though she's touting herself as the heir to Obama's legacy? Unbelievable. Hopefully enough good Christian Whites will get out and Mr. Trump will be installed as our next POTUS. If not I'm afraid what the consequences will be.

TLB #81

On Men Dressing As Women & Entering Women's Bathrooms So They Can Sexually Assault Actual Women & Little Girls

Hard to believe, but the "progressive" Left is in FAVOR of this! Clearly this is an integral component to the Democrat's war on women. Calling legislation designed to prevent these tragedies (women and girls being assaulted/raped/murdered) in public restrooms is "discrimination"?!!

Proof that the Left is evil. Want more proof? How about the faux outrage that ensued after our future president, Donald J. Trump, expressed support for punishing women who murder babies (have abortions)? Only the Satanically-aligned Left would be outraged by the suggestion that killers of children should be held accountable when babies are slaughtered. Just call the kid a "fetus" and it's OK?

The Bible says "thou shalt no kill". It doesn't say, "thou shalt not kill, unless you're going to kill a baby still in the womb... then go ahead". I've got to wonder about the Left's motivations for their opposition to bathroom rape. Is it possible they want more babies that can be aborted... as an offering to the Dark One?

Donald Trump, being a Godly man, is opposed to the slaughter of innocents demanded by the Left. My only issue with Trump is his support for Planned Parenthood. Not for the many many abortions they perform, but for all the other good stuff (supposedly they do stuff re women's health). As if that other stuff makes up for all the murdering.

Perhaps Mr. Trump is hopeful that he can get some Conservative Democrats to vote for him? I honestly don't have a clue. There are Democrats that support the unborn's right to life (even if they are a minority in a party that generally approves of killing kids). They do exist, so why not go for their votes?

Which is why I'd preferred to be able to vote for Mike Huckabee, who promised to protect the unborn (using the National Guard to shut down the abortionists) on day one of his presidency. And he was strongly opposed to the abomination (and affront to the Lord) of homos marrying. Unfortunately, he dropped out.

So Trump is the only one left, what with the Canadian-born Cruz being ineligible. Not that I did not enthusiastically vote for Mr. Trump in the primary. I did. Because I'm convinced that he will be an excellent president who WILL make America great again.

TLB #78

Transgendered Leftist Activist Attacks Planned Parenthood, Shoots Cops & Veteran In A False Flag Operation

This commentary concerns the Colorado Springs shooting at Planned Parenthood on 11/27/2015. in which "a police officer and two civilians were killed. The shooter, a nutjob named Robert Lewis Dear, surrendered and was taken into custody after a standoff that lasted five hours".

The junior US Senator from Texas and Republican Presidential hopeful Ted Cruz, following the PP killings, revealed that the shooter is a "transgendered Leftist activist".

Cruz explained, "We know that he was a man registered to vote as a woman". This discrepancy on Dear's voter registration was first reported by The Gateway Pundit, a self-described "right-of-center news website", under the claim that he "identifies as [a] woman". Conservatives have since run with the claim that Dear is transgender. (Source).

I'm guessing that this is a false flag operation designed to give the Left ammunition in it's quest to keep Planned Parenthood open so it can continue murdering babies and selling them for parts. As Mike Huckabee said, the PP murders are "selling baby's body parts like the parts of a Buick". They found another opportunity to profit off their holocaust of the unborn and took it, in other words.

We know the shooter is a Leftist, despite where the shooting occurred, BTW, due to who he killed. Two police officers and a Veteran. Individuals from two organizations that the Left despises. We know that the so-called "Black Lives Matters" movement has been targeting police officers for murder. Now the Left is targeting cops and Veterans... and in places where they can claim that the Right is responsible.

The shooting took place in a Planned Parenthood, proof that the shooter was a Conservative... they'll say. To which I say bullshit. The fact that 1) this dirtbag was a transgender, and 2) he targeted police and veterans - proves that this "dear" fellow was a Leftwinger. Clearly.

BTW, props to Senator Cruz for bringing this to the attention of the nation. Maybe Donald Trump will select him as his VP? That would be acceptable to me, except for the fact that Cruz was born in Canada and thus the "natural born" question comes into play. That, and his father was a Cuban, I hear. A better choice would be Mike Huckabee, I think.

Huckabee, in my opinion, would be an excellent choice because he has promised to use the National Guard to shut down the Planned Parenthood baby murdering factories.

TLB #65

Our Disgrace of a President Uses Office to Officially Endorse The Right To Murder Privately

On Friday April 25th, in a move that some might describe as an endorsement of evil, our disgraceful and incompetent prez met with those who murder babies for profit. Doing something no president before him had ever considered, Hussein spoke out in favor of a woman's right to have her unborn child put to death, because, as a past Supreme Court determined, it is a matter of her "privacy".

Regarding Planned Parenthood, Obama reportedly said "It's not going anywhere today, it's not going anywhere tomorrow". No doubt he is correct, as Obama will, most likely, appoint at least one SCOTUS judge during his second term (unless impeached). There is no doubt that Jesus cries for the lives of the tens of thousands of babies whose lives could have been saved if only Romney were president; Romney appointed the next SCOTUS judge, and Roe V Wade was overturned.

At least we still have Republican state Legislatures and Governors working hard to stop the abortionists and shut down their murder factories, including despicable corporations like Planned Parenthood. Places where doctors ignore their oaths to "do no harm" and slaughter infants in the womb.

We all know Hussein endorsed infanticide in the past (when he served in the IL state senate), but now he has used the office of the presidency to officially endorse it! The Godless Liberals must be overjoyed the holocaust of the unborn will continue to be "legal". Murder is illegal when the victim is outside the womb, but for some reason that is beyond me it is perfectly legal if the victim's umbilical cord is still attached.

The hypocritical Liberals claimed that those who oppose baby butchery are waging a "war on women". Additionally, these immoral Liberals mock the pious and moral by inventing a fake "religion" they call "humanism". Wikipedia says, "Humanism is a group of philosophies and ethical perspectives which emphasize the value and agency of human beings", but fighting to keep murder private isn't ethical, it is very, very unethical!

Can there be any doubt that Satan smiled when the "Humanist" Liberals won and Barack Hussein Obama was "elected" to a second term! I say shame on Liberals for supporting this barbarism. How can they live with themselves? At least Conservatives like me who value the lives of the sweet innocent babies can take solace in the fact that their murderers will have to answer to the All Mighty for their reprehensible crimes.

And, speaking of things that are illegal, I probably need to make it clear that I do not support the assassination of abortion doctors, heinous though their actions may be. This is a problem that can't be solved through vigilantism.

Yes, the re-election of the nation's top champion of killing kids, Barack Hussein Obama, means we probably won't be able to shut down the Liberal dream of snuffing out the lives of as many innocent babies as possible (by overturning Rove V Wade), but, like I said earlier, the Republican Governors and Republicans in the state congresses have the right idea - shut down the abortion factories by any legal means possible.

TLB #37

Kill All Humans (Except White Conservatives)

Liberals think that Conservatives want to, like the robot Bender on the cartoon Futurama, kill all humans. Except the White Conservatives ones, that is (the females we just want to subjugate). I've been accused of it here on this very blog. I express concern regarding radical Islam and the casualties incurred when they wage jihad on the West; then I suggest some modest measures we might consider to combat it, and, to a Liberal, that translates to me wanting to chuck the Constitution, round up all Muslims and place them in Concentration camps, and then kill every last one of them.

When I express concern about what the Supreme Court might do regarding the definition of marriage, I'm accused of wanting to do the same thing to homosexuals (rounding them up and killing them). I wrote a post expressing my strong disagreement with Liberal politics, and guess what? That means I want to round them up all the Liberals and kill them.

I've never even mentioned the Mexican citizens that have illegally invaded our country, but, never mind that inconvenient fact. I want to round them up and kill them all as well. Perhaps you see a pattern here? Liberals don't like it when you disagree with them. It makes them so hysterical that they immediately jump to hyperbole. They can't engage in rational discussion; they can only accuse you of wanting to murder those who disagree with you.

But I'm sure that only some Liberals react in this manner. Some of them must be capable of rational discourse? Not many, I'm afraid. They all seemed to embrace on the "war on women" meme when Conservatives mentioned their moral objection to killing babies in the womb. If, like me, you weren't surprised when the Boston bombers turned out to be radicalized Muslims, that makes you a bigot. No matter that they turned out to be White. The Left knows you expected them to be dark skinned as well.

Which brings me to our president. If you question any of his policies it must be because he is African-American. It couldn't possibly be because you take issue with those polices, the same way you did when they were espoused by the WHITE Liberal president Bill Clinton!

Additionally, if, like me, you respect our nation's laws and think people of other countries shouldn't be able to cross our borders without prior approval and obtain employment without a social security number or (at the very least) a green card, that makes you a racist.

And, God forbid you're a Christian who adheres to the teachings of the Bible when it comes to the definition of marriage. Clearly God said it wasn't just a contract between two people, no matter their sex. You're a homophobe if you want to keep marriage the way it is and support the laws on the books (DOMA).

So, seeing as I support the second amendment that must mean I dream of shooting dead all humans that aren't like me, right? Absolutely not. Do I want to convince more people that my way of thinking is the way to go? Yes, I do. But that's human nature. Failing that, hopefully we can meet in the middle. It's called compromise, a concept many Liberals clearly do not understand.

No, "stamping out" Liberalism does not sound like compromise, but that (a prior post title of mine) was hyperbole intended to attract readers and spark a discussion. As I pointed out in the post, I do not believe Liberalism can be eliminated entirely. But at least tone it down Liberals! Compromise with us! But I don't know if those on the fringe (the far, far Left) will ever see reason. I do not know if they are capable of compromising. I fear not.

TLB #33

Note to Libertarians

Stop pretending to be Republican! You may be able to fool a small segment of the population and get elected to a single congressional district or a single state (if you betray your Libertarian beliefs and say you oppose abortion), but one of your ilk has no chance at all of winning the Republican presidential nomination.

Also, you can stop pretending you have a chance of winning even a single electoral vote running on the Libertarian ticket. Some independents and moderates may throw their vote away and cast their ballot in your favor, but you will never accumulate enough of the vote to win even a single state.

All your efforts accomplish is to peel off a small segment of the Republican electorate (in addition to the aforementioned deluded independents and moderates), but the amount of votes you garner will never be enough to come within leagues of actually winning. The most you can hope to accomplish is to tip a tight election, with the most likely scenario being the election being flipped Republican to Democrat.

At least with a Republican you get a partial win, as we agree with you on fiscal issues. I must ask the citizens who would vote for such a candidate - is flushing the economy down the toilet worth it to stand on principal and vote for one of these candidates (either Libertarian or Libertarian running as a Republican)?

TLB #27

Saving America by Stamping Out Liberalism

Liberalism is a scourge on our great nation and needs to be stomped out if we are to survive. Unfortunately I am strongly convinced that things will get worse before they get better, however. Much, much worse. Four more years of Obamanomics may spell our doom. So, what's the solution? Stamp out Liberalism, of course. After Obama fails perhaps the people will come to their sense and realize there is no such thing as a free lunch?

We shall have to wait and see. In any case, following are the Liberal laws, court rulings, programs, institutions and ideas I feel we need to get rid of to make America work again. Of course getting rid of them all entirely will be a monumental task, and may or may not be possible. Liberalism is like a weed: just when you think you've eradicated it, it grows back. The allure of free stuff you didn't have to work for is strong, and a certain unproductive sector of the public will always demand it as if it were their right.

Abortion: Roe V Wade should be overturned. Why is murder covered under a woman's right to privacy? If you don't want a baby use birth control. If you don't want to use birth control get your tubes tied. I'd support exceptions if a woman's life is in danger, but it would have to be proven that the likelihood of death was high (otherwise the exception would likely be abused).

Affirmative Action: rewards should be based on merit only. Slavery ended a long time ago. Are there any former slaves living today? Are there any children of former slaves alive today? No.

Citizens United, Opposition to: Liberals oppose it because the money isn't on their side, but free speech is protected by our Constitution and this ruling by the Supreme Court affirms that right.

Food Stamps: If you want to eat you have to work. It's that simple. Should there be some aid for people who are disabled through no fault of their own and cannot work? Yes, but it should be handled mainly by the churches and private charities. Government's involvement should be minimal.

Foreign Aid: How does this benefit the United States? With the exception of Israel, most of it should be done away with.

Global Climate Change: A disproved theory that should be the basis of no governmental legislation. The Liberal wet dream of taxing carbon via "cap and trade" or any other method should never be considered again.

Green Energy: "Green" is just a marketing term to sell less efficient and more expensive forms of energy. If these forms of energy can actually compete, then let them do so without the deceptive marketing spin (and government subsidies).

Inequality, Demonization of: In life there are winners and losers. Demonizing the winners does not help the losers; in fact it hurts them. The winners are innovators and job creators, and their existence is a huge net positive for the economy.

Medicare: Should be gradually phased out. People have paid into it and should get that money back (and no more).

Medicaid: Should be eliminated for the same reason the food stamp program should be done away with.

The Minimum Wage: The free market is the best way to determine how much any particular worker should be paid. Government mandating a "minimum" is distortive meddling.

Nuclear Energy, Opposition to: Nuclear energy is a relatively safe and cost effective way to meet our growing energy needs.

Progressive taxation: I'm not opposed to the wealthy paying slightly more, but progressives use that as an excuse to gouge higher wage earners. Punishing hard work via confiscatory taxation is morally wrong and counterproductive.

Tariffs: Goods should be able to flow freely and not be taxed simply because they were manufactured in other countries. Tariffs increase the cost of goods for American consumers and are bad for our economy.

Unions, Private Sector: Institute a national Right-to-Work law and private sector unions will crumble. Why do workers have a say in the way a business is run? Only the owners should have a say. If the workers don't like the way the owners decide they want to run THEIR OWN BUSINESS they can quit. Or form their own business.

Unions, Public Sector: Should be outlawed. They cost taxpayers too much. In fact, I'm in favor of doing away with most public sector jobs, period. Many, if not most of them could be privatized (the private sector being much more efficient).

TLB #24

Atheists Intellectually Superior, But Going To Hell

Atheists like to make fun of Christians, referring to the Almighty as an invisible or imaginary friend. I'm not a Christian who takes the Bible 100 percent literal, but I wouldn't dream of referring to a Christian who did as a Bible-thumping moron.

These atheists who look down their noses at Christians - on one hand their snobbery can make my blood boil. On the other hand, I feel sympathy for them, seeing as this life is short and they'll be spending eternity in unbelievable agony burning in the lake of fire.

This sympathy is not so great that it should allow them to discriminate against believers, however. In this life I'd prefer to not have to put up with their condescension and mocking, thank you. On the Left we have religious intolerants like Bill Maher (a vile know-it-all who made a Christian-bashing film that makes fun of how stupid believers are for having faith). This does not exist so much on the Right, except for Libertarians.

Libertarians are, it is my understanding, traditionally atheist. Ayn Rand was an atheist, but Rand Paul is not. I don't understand that. Pen Jillette is a Libertarian, and very strongly atheist. I've seen him on TV bashing Christians for their beliefs, so I know he's lying when he says he's "very respectful of Christians in [his] book". The book is titled, "God No!" and is all about how he's better than the gullible fools who believe in a power greater than them (Or, that is what I strongly suspect the book is about, as I have not read it).

Some Liberals claim to be Christian, but it is impossible for anyone who is OK with murdering babies to be Christian. Murder is prohibited in the 10 commandments. Liberals also believe in stealing from those who work hard and giving it to the lay-abouts who think government should provide for all their needs. They may as well reject God and go atheist because their God does not exist.

I think Liberals who claim to be believers are fake Christians using Christianity to justify their selfishness... which is something they have in common with the atheists - snobbery and selfishness, although they add an admiration for sloth, something the atheists don't subscribe to.

In any case, I believe the judgment for atheists and Liberals will be the same in the end - eternal damnation. Not that they are worried, as being wrong is a possibility that is incomprehensible to them.

TLB #22