Father Of Canadian Born Ted Cruz Linked To JFK Assassin Oswald

As you likely know, Ted Cruz, the man ineligible to be president due to being born a Canadian citizen, dropped out of the race for the White House. Thank goodness. Not that there was any doubt in my mind AT ALL that Mr. Trump would prevail. But if Cruz somehow had become the nominee, you can bet that the question of his eligibility would have plagued and likely derailed his campaign.

Yes, the current president isn't eligible to hold the office of the president for the same reason (not born in the United States), but Ted Cruz was running as a Republican! Whereas it was fine to sweep B. Hussein's lack of a non-forged birth certificate under the rug because it was "racist" to question the eligibility of the first Black president, Ted Cruz is a White Republican.

Or Cruz is perceived as such, despite being Hispanic on his father's side. Much the same as Hussein is Black (and Muslim) on HIS father's side. But, like I said, with Hussein none of that mattered very much. He was still able to run for and "win" an office he wasn't eligible to hold.

But the hypocrite Dems would have objected to Ted Cruz being the nominee (if he had "won"). I heard that a nutjob from Florida named Alan Grayson said "he'll sue over Canadian-born Cruz's natural-born citizen status if the senator is the GOP nominee".

Mr. Trump was also worried about Cruz's eligibility. But unlike Grayson (who defends the interloper Hussein), Mr. Trump has been very strong on the subject of only people who are eligible being able to run for the presidency. Given the fact that he's gone after Obama; questioning his phony-baloney birth certificate.

Recently Mr. Trump brought up another issue that could have brought down the Cruz candidacy, had he been the nominee (if the GOP had stolen the nomination from Mr. Trump via a brokered convention).

Trump first made the inflammatory claim on the morning of May 3 on Fox and Friends: Cruz's "father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald being, you know, shot". The charge is lifted straight from the grocery store checkout tabloids, specifically a National Enquirer report based on photos of Oswald handing out pro-Fidel Castro pamphlets in New Orleans in 1963. Two photo experts told the Enquirer that another man in the grainy image bears a resemblance to young Rafael Cruz Sr. (Anatomy of a talking point: Donald Trump on the JFK assassination by Linda Qiu. PolitiFact 5/6/2016).

Note that this story is from the Leftwing smear site, PolitiFact. Here PolitiFact says "we rated Trump's claim Pants on Fire". But I trust Mr. Trump, given the fact that he is a man of high integrity and surely would not repeat an allegation such as this unless he was absolutely positive it was correct.

Which isn't to say that I think Ted Cruz should be held responsible for his father's role in the assassination of JFK (whatever that role was). There is the fact, however, that Ted is still very tight with his father... giving him a big hug after conceding the race to Mr. Trump (while elbowing his wife Heidi in the face).

And Ted's father Rafael was very active in his son's efforts to court Evangelical voters. Something that Mr. Trump commented on saying, "it's disgraceful that his father can go out and do that". And people are angry about it. Angry because Rafael lied about God being on his son Ted's side and saying that (if Ted is not prez) "the alternative could be the destruction of America".

Which is, of course, total bullcrap. The destruction of American will occur if Hillary is elected president. But the man to prevent that destruction is Donald J. Trump, NOT Ted Cruz! Frankly I think the DOJ should look into deporting both lying Ted and his lying father. Perhaps that might happen when Mr. Trump is elected president?

Image: Canadian-born Ted Cruz elbows his wife in the face while hugging a traitor who conspired to kill a US president (his Cuban-born father).

TLB #80

The Tyrant Obama Orders Death From Above Via Drone

The issue with his birth certificate, budget-busting healthcare "reform", an attempt to classify CO2 as a pollutant, more thievery in the form of increased taxes, refusing to defend DOMA, an attempt to weaken the second amendment, the Benghazi cover up, and now the scandalous revelation that Hussein's IRS targeted Conservative groups... certainly one can not deny that Hussein's presidency is the worst since (at least) Jimmy Carter.

In particular the ability to execute American citizens as he sees fit gives Libertarian John Myers of the Personal Liberty Digest serious cause for concern. Mr. Myers warns of Hussein's "secret army" that allows Hussein to act as "executioner against Americans he sees as his enemy".

Myers points out that Liberal author Jeremy Scahill says "Obama has been granted a blank check to vastly expand drone strikes while blatantly ignoring the Constitution by denying habeas corpus". Yes, Hussein has only executed two American citizens, SO FAR, but "when you stop denying one subset of Americans due process, you are on a slippery slope toward eliminating other Americans whom the President and his secret cabal classify as enemies".

Frankly, I think it a good think when the lives of terrorist scum like al-Awlaki are ended via hellfire missile, but there needs to be some checks and balances on the process. Congress should be involved and who is on the "kill list" should not be in the hands of the executive only!

If this blatant ignoring of the Constitution were being done by a Republican president the hypocrite Liberals would be screaming impeachment, yet their savior Obama does it and not a peep?

TLB #42

Is Barack Hussein Obama an Illegitimate President?

There are those who believe the last election was stolen. That massive voter fraud swung it in Obama's favor and that Romney actually won. I think these people are definitely on to something. But, as history has shown us, once a president is elected (or he appears to have been elected), nothing can be done to undo the announced election results.

So Obama, legitimate or not, won't be ejected from office. His "win" won't be overturned because nobody is investigating the voter fraud issue. Republicans continue to work to see that it's reduced in the future, but past voter fraud will stand. Clearly Obama'a presidency could be illegitimate in that his win was due to voter fraud (that will never be investigated and thus never proven), but what about the "natural born citizen" issue? That issue was resolved when Obama (under pressure) FINALLY released his Hawaiian long form birth certificate, right?

Not so fast kemosabe! The Hawaiian birth certificate that Hussein released may have fooled the Liberal media, but others say it's a forgery. CBS News in Arizona reported on an investigation initiated by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and they say Joe's investigators "confirmed" the document was created using Photoshop (see video below).

Snopes does a pretty good job "debunking" the "created in Photoshop" charge, but Snopes is the same site that "debunked" the allegation that Al Gore claimed to have invented the internet. They based their conclusion on some bullpucky about "create" and "invent" not having the same meaning - but go to any dictionary website and you'll find that the words are synonyms.

Also, Wikipedia notes that the site's creator David Mikkelson "has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias". Maybe their defense of Al Gore using a nonsense argument about synonyms having different meanings could have something to do with these "Liberal bias" accusations?

On the other hand, the Snopes page links to a Fox New article! I suppose this was done to convince Right-wingers? "Look Right-winger, we're linking to FOX NEWS"!! But check this out - if you Google the name of the Photoshop expert, "Jean-Claude Tremblay", one of the articles that comes up on top is, "Fox News expert denies he claimed birth certificate legit".

Tremblay (the Fox News expert) says, "the network must retract the story, [because] it deliberately misquoted him". Tremblay says his findings don't prove the authenticity of the document one way or the other, but Fox News refuses to allow him to correct their story. As a result Tremblay feels "anger verging on disdain" and no longer trusts Fox News. I guess that blows the Snopes "debunking" out of the water. This expert's analysis went from "absolutely legit" to "can't say one way or the other". Question is, why would Fox News put forward a story that misrepresents what the Photoshop expert said?

The newspaper announcements that some cite as "proof" have also been questioned. Both of the two papers that ran the birth announcements said their information came from the state Department of Health and the "certificates of live birth". But these certificates require no proof that the child was actually born in Hawaii; instead they are issued if the child's parents have "declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child".

Furthermore, a neighbor living next to the address where the birth announcement says the Obamas lived can't recall that a White woman who gave birth to a black baby ever lived there, and an investigator looking into the matter discovered the house was owned by an "Orland S. and Thelma S. (Young) Lefforge, both of whom are deceased".

In conclusion I must say that (for me, at least), the question of where Barack Hussein Obama was actually born is still unknown - but the claim that he was born in Hawaii seems incredibly suspect. If he was actually born in Hawaii you'd think there wouldn't be all these questions. For me, the fact that there are all these questions point to a cover-up. And why cover-up where he was actually born unless he was born outside the United States?

Back to the question regarding Barack Hussein Obama's presidency and it's legitimacy. Is he a legitimate president? Was he legitimately elected? Is he Constitutionally eligible to serve? I say the facts seem to strongly suggest that he is illegitimate for two reasons. First of all, his "win" was accomplished via voter fraud, and secondly - he wasn't even eligible to run in the first place!

TLB #38

The Barack Hussein Obama Impeachment

My sources tell me that, should prez Hussein bomb Syria, a bill for impeachment will be introduced in the House. Apparently SecDef Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee "he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations". House Republicans say that if Panetta and Hussein carry through with those sentiments it would be a violation of Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, which gives the right to declare war to Congress alone.

I say WHY WAIT? Why hasn't Hussein been impeached already? He already broke with the Constitution when he bombed Lybia, as noted by ultra-Liberal congressman Dennis Kucinich. When the most Liberal congressman speaks against the actions of the most Liberal president ever -- one might think the Liberal media would pay attention instead of sweeping the issue under the rug. But no! The Liberal media swept and Kucinich was redistricted out of a job. Coincidence?

Hussein could also be impeached in regards to the Bengazhi cover up, for stealing the election last November, the Fast and Furious cover up, his American citizen hit list, the recess appointments made WHILE Congress was in session, the appointment of czars without Senate approval, violating the 10th amendment by suing Arizona for enforcing immigration laws, executive orders giving amnesty to the here-illegally "dreamers", for his refusal to enforce DOMA, and for his executive actions on gun control.

And, of course there is the fact (or high probability) that his Hawaiian birth certificate is fake. Covering up the fact that you aren't a natural born citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as POTUS, must be an impeachable offense. The Constitution clearly spells out the requirements one must meet to hold the office, and Hussein, due to his either having been born in Kenya or having a non-citizen father, has never even been eligible to be our commander in chief!

That's such a long list, how could anyone not agree that Hussein is one of the most lawless presidents in US history! Many of his offenses are far worse than Watergate, so what is the Republican-controlled House waiting for?? Hopefully the Republicans will retake the Senate in the 2014 midterms and then the impeachment of our illegitimate prez will commence.

The only problem is then we'd be left with dufus Biden as prez. I wonder if he's done anything he could be impeached for? Unfortunately being a bumbling idiot isn't an impeachable offense, although, being the VP, he probably was involved in some of Hussein's anti-Constitutional actions. Maybe we can get them both out and move John Boehner into the presidency?

TLB #29