Liberal Media Focusing On Donald Trump's Penis While Ignoring The Fact That Our Current "President" Is A Gay Sex Addicted Muslim Pervert

Big surprise, huh? That the Liberal Media would lie about Mr. Trump having a small penis (when it is actually huge) while totally ignoring that fact that the so-called "president" (B. Hussein Obama) is a Muslim infiltrator who attended a Christian church lead by a pastor who hates American. Oh, and that he's a gay sex addicted pervert.

Don't believe me? Yeah, well one of his ex-secret service protectors tells the truth and spills the beans in a recent book.

Secret Service Agent Says Obama Is Muslim & Gay In New Tell-All Book (excerpt from a News Examiner article by Michael Davies) A former Secret Service agent... says it is time the public knows the real truth about our Commander in Chief, Barack Obama. Former agent, Paul Horner, in his new tell-all book "The Black House", reveals what goes on inside the White House when the news cameras are turned off. In an interview with NBC News, Horner told Senior Political Analyst Tom Downey that he is one-hundred-percent positive that President Obama is not only gay, but a radical Muslim as well. "Everyone on the inside knows that Obama is gay and a Muslim, it is common knowledge", Horner said. "I saw many men coming and going from Obama's room, at all hours. ...I am in no way homophobic, but Obama's insatiable lust for homosexual liaisons is like nothing I've ever witnessed. We're talking 10-15 partners in a single day". "I would say a good portion of the men, over fifty-percent, were Muslim... When no one was around, except his security, Obama couldn't wait to get out of his suit and into his Muslim tunic. He would wear it while praying to the prophet Muhammad throughout the day. During these prayer sessions he insisted that he not be disturbed". "He constantly made jokes about Americans, frequently referring to them as mongoloids and idiots. Christians were his favorite verbal punching bags. He has absolutely no respect for the Christian religion. I believe he actually hates Christians, and finds their ideology to be old fashioned and ignorant". (Link).

This is an ex-Secret Service man, so he is absolutely in a position to know the truth about our gay Muslim "president". You really think he'd lie about something so shocking? I don't. I mean, surely other Secret Service members (ex and current) would speak out if Mr. Horner was making this all up. You hear of any refutations? I sure haven't. No doubt the Obamaites think if they simply don't address these rumors people will say "that can't possibly be true".

Yet we have here (in Mr. Horner) a man who is saying that it IS true! Now, supposedly Snopes "debunked" this story, but I'm not buying it.

Snopes: [None] of these assertions about President Obama [are] true, nor did a former Secret Service agent named Paul Horner write a tell-all book titled The Black House. The NewsExaminer is a fake news web site, and NBC.com.co (which has no affiliation with the NBC network) is a shill fake news web site that reproduces content from NewsExaminer. (Link).

So it's all fake? If that's the case, then why is it that Amazon has a book titled The Black House available for sale? Yeah, according to Amazon the author of this book is Curtis R. Cochran, and not Paul Horner, but I'm guessing that Paul Horner, not being a professional writer, had this Cochran fellow write it up.

So, nice try Snopes, but your "debunk" fails. Apparently the Snopes idiots didn't think that anyone would check if such a book was actually available for sale. Which it is. I mean, I entered "The Black House Paul Horner" into the Amazon search box and this book came up. Also, if you look at the comments on News Examiner's site (attached to the excerpted article above) it's clear that numerous people have read the book. How could people have read it if it doesn't exist? Answer? Obviously they couldn't have.

You think the American people would have voted for Obama had they known this! Even African Americans (who support B. Hussein very strongly) would have rejected him if they had known the truth, I think. Sure, there are Black Muslims (The Nation of Islam), but there are also a lot of African Americans who are Christian. However, neither Christianity nor Islam are accepting of perversions like homosexuality, so I suspect that even Muslims wouldn't have voted for him.

But the Leftist Media clearly is. Accepting of perversion, that is. Which is why they're complicit in this cover up (their part being to not cover/ignore the truth about Obama). Instead they go after fine upstanding good Christian men like Mr. Trump. With made up stories about having a small penis (when his penis is actually humongous).

Disgusting (not Mr. Trump's big penis - that isn't what is disgusting. What's disgusting is that they lie about it being small. Also disgusting that they cover up the truth about our gay sex addicted America-hating Muslim "president").

TLB #75

The Liberal Media's Sick Obsession With Donald Trump's Penis

Caution! This post contains explicit descriptions of the sex act. Not for Children!

The following via some sicko posting on an obscure website called "the cut". This is (according to the article) an excerpt from a fiction book by our future president's ex-wife, Ivana, in which a man and woman "do it". The man (here called "Adam") is a stand in for Mr. Trump. Or so says the article author.

[Adam] took a nipple between his lips, flicked it with his tongue, and felt Katrinka's arms tighten around his neck, her body arch in pleasure. In a moment, they were on the floor, on top of the mink coat, Katrinka's legs gripping his waist as he moved deeper and deeper into her. Finally, after a long time, they finished and lay quiet, each one trying to come to terms with the depth of feeling the other inspired, so much stronger, more compelling than anything either had experienced with other lovers, sometimes bewildering in its intensity, producing alternately joy and terror. As Adam pulled away from her, his cock fell for a moment into the valley between her legs, leaving a smear of semen on the dark silk. He smiled with satisfaction. (Link).

The article goes on from there, chronicling through time each time Donald Trump's penis is mentioned. Or each time Donald Trump mentions his penis. The article is titled "A History of Donald Trump's Penis".

Yeah, it's no wonder the smut-obsessed Liberal media has latched onto this and won't let go. As we all know, it's perverts who gravitate toward the Left. As the "Duck Dynasty" guy, Phil Robertson said, "I'm Republican because Democrats endorse perversion". This is surely an accurate statement.

That's why it really makes me mad when the Liberal media refers to Mr. Trump as "racist" or a "bigot" when the truth is that the Democrat Party is the Party of hate. When it's Democrats who want to tear apart the family and replace family values with perversion. Mr. Trump is a good family man. Yes, he's been married a few times, but each time it was (1) one at a time, and (2) a union of one man and one women. Unlike with Dems, who think two men or two women can be "married".

BTW, clearly Mr. Trump was right to divorce Ivana, author of the pornographic (and gross) "novel" excerpted above... an excerpt from the 1992 "novel" For Love Alone. Trump divorced her in 1991. Perhaps because he came across this smut (while Ivana was writing it) and was disgusted?

Anyway, what this shows is that everyone (it seems) appears to be obsessed with Mr. Trump's member. His ex-wife, the Liberal media, etc. Why? I guess that people's privates are just on the minds of these sick perverts constantly. Is "Little Marco" a closet Liberal? That he was the one that brought up Mr. Trump's penis during the debate does make me wonder. I mean, he IS hispanic. but then, so is the Hispanic-Canadian Cruz.

Another reason to elect Trump. He's the only one left in the race who is a REAL American. Yeah, Kasich is still in it (for some reason), but he does not now (nor did he ever) have a snowball's chance in hell. He won Ohio and then made a big deal about it. How sad and pathetic! He should drop out already. Also, given the fact that he accepted the Medicaid expansion, I have to ask... is this guy a real Conservative or a RINO?

Kasich is opposed to murdering babies in the womb, so he does pass that litmus test. But helping poor losers instead of letting them suffer the consequences of their own bad decisions? No, that doesn't fly with me. No way I'd vote for him. Not that it matters, as Trump pretty much has the nomination in the bag at this point.

TLB #74

Sick Liberal Pervert Leo DiCraprio Stars In Film Where He Is Homo Raped By A Bear

The following from the Drudge Report website concerning an upcoming movie from Liberal Hollyweird.

The new movie Revenant features a shocking scene of a wild bear raping Leo DiCaprio! The explicit moment from Oscar winning director Alejandro Inarritu has caused maximum controversy in early screenings. ... The story of rural survivalism and revenge reaches new violent levels for a mainstream film. The bear flips Leo over and thrusts and thrusts during the explicit mauling. He is raped - twice! (Source).

Now, I have seen other stories on the net in which the studio responsible for this filth denies the homo rape scene... but I'm not buying it. Has Drudge issued a retraction? If so, I haven't seen it. Given the fact that this movie hasn't opened yet, perhaps the scene in question will be edited out before it hits theaters?

Who knows? I do know that once again the Liberal media is saying that a fine Conservative news source is lying. Frankly I am sick of it. We all know that it's the Liberal media that lies more than Hillary Clinton.

This is why I can report that I will NOT be going to see this pornographic trash! With or without the gay rape scene, this movie was still directed by the same fool responsible for Birdman, a 2014 film that "garnered wide acclaim and numerous accolades including Academy Award nominations" despite being terrible.

I stupidly sat through this stupidity recently (during a free movie channel preview) only to find that there was no ending! The main character (played by Michael Keaton) might have jumped to his death from a hospital window, or perhaps he actually flew away. I won't try to explain as doing so isn't worth the effort. The bottom line is that Birdman was one of the dumbest movies I've ever seen. Take my advice and avoid any film directed by Alejandro Inarritu.

But, despite how bad it was, that didn't stop Hollyweird from heaping praise upon it.

By the way, this outdoes Hollyweird's obsession with everything gay and unnatural. Two other films I've heard about recently that focus on perversity include Carol (features a lesbian relationship between Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara) and The Danish Girl (which "stars Eddie Redmayne as Lili Elbe, one of the first known recipients of sex reassignment surgery").

All this following the SCOTUS decision to legalize the unnatural "union" of two people of the same sex. And, now that this sickness is being referred to as "marriage", Hollyweird thinks it's OK for them to embrace wickedness by making it central to the plot in many more movies.

Which is why I'm thinking that this bear raping scene being in "Revenant" (as reported by Drudge) is likely factual. Because, now that the SCOTUS has let this genie out of the bottle, perversions are becoming the norm. And Hollyweird is no longer content with perversion involving man or woman alone. Logically the next step includes other perversions such as bestiality.

Obviously Liberals are to blame for this. They wish to send America to hell in a handbasket, and getting the public to accept more and more perversity is a part of that plan. Me, I'm praying that our next president is a Republican. This being yet another example of how having a Liberal in the White House leads to bad things. What we have here is an example of evil percolating down from the top.

TLB #67

Barlowe Rejects The Sin Of Homosexuality (Not That He Was Ever - Even For One Second - Tempted)

As Doctor Ben Carson truthfully related, being a homo is your choice. And, despite tasting semen for the first time in his life, Barlowe did NOT like it and was NOT converted. Barlowe CHOSE to remain totally straight. Although his abuser tried very hard to convince me to chose the "alternate" homo lifestyle, Barlowe refused.

I was not making a double entendre either, when I said Barlowe's abuser tried very "hard". While his abuser's member was extremely hard (as well as extremely large), I was referring to the efforts only. By which I mean the anal raping. As well as the oral raping. Barlowe did not enjoy it one bit. In fact, it was pure hell.

I do take some solace, however, in the fact that my abuser is going there (hell, that is). For being a homo, as well as for the raping. In any case, I am now doing my best to put this nightmare behind me. Also not a double entendre... although, yes, my behind was quite sore for awhile.

Luckily Barlowe has not contracted AIDS. Which I got myself tested for as soon as I was released from the slammer. What a relief! But the nightmare is not over yet, it seems. Dan, my former co "worker" sued Barlowe and Barlowe lost! In addition to paying for Dan's medical bills (resetting his broken nose), a large judgment was handed down for "pain and suffering".

Because the wuss cried a lot in court about how much pain he was in... and the jury bought his act. And awarded Dan an extra 1.2 million, which was Barlowe's entire life savings!

Now Barlowe is utterly broke! Not only that, but none of his former clients were interested in taking their business to Barlowe. Yeah, I tried to start my own firm and poach my former clients, but none bit. (the a-holes!).

So, for now, I'm flipping burgers at Mickey-D's. How humiliating! But still I work hard, in order to impress the pimply-faced teen who is now my "superior" that giving an ex-con a second chance was a good idea.

By the way, in regards to Barlowe being a completely straight male, one of the first things I did after receiving my first Mickey-D's check was to find a hooker and give her a good banging (missionary). Sex outside of marriage might be something the Lord frowns upon, but I think the Lord would give ol' Barlowe a pass, given recent events.

Fact is, I think the Lord smiled when he saw proof that Barlowe had rejected the sin of homosexuality.

TLB #60, BS #9.

Congratulated For Being Gay?

Prez Hussein apparently phoned NBA player Jason Collins and congratulated him for having sex with other men. Is it just me or did this move cause you to think, WTF? Me, I could have lived my entire life and been just fine not knowing this sports figure engages in sodomy. But if you're famous and draw attention to yourself by letting the entire world know what kind of deviant behavior you partake in while in the boudoir, Obama will call you personally and say, "job well done".

Job well done? For what, making us normals lose our lunches, and forcing us to explain to our children how two people of the same sex can "do it"? Sex is a private matter between two people (a man and a woman if you adhere to the Bible), and it should REMAIN that way.

Remember awhile back when there was a story that suggested Hussein might be involved in a relationship with a man? The Liberal media swept those allegations under the rug, but I've read that "it is common knowledge in the Chicago gay community that Obama actively visited the gay bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator".

A homosexual man named Larry Sinclair says "he had sex and used cocaine twice with Obama while Obama was an Illinois state senator". He wrote a book about the affair titled, "Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder". The book description on Amazon says Obama, "smoked crack cocaine while being fellated".

If accurate this is truly disgusting. However, it certainly could explain Hussein's enthusiasm in supporting the homosexual agenda. Will we ever know the truth? According to one of the individuals reporting on Barack's homo-ness, "all of this is going to be as public knowledge as JFK's affair with Marilyn Monroe and the other women he cavorted with while married to Jackie". Eventually it will come out.

Maybe the day the truth is revealed will be in 2016 when Obama leaves Michelle, "comes out" and marries another man. Then we shall know that this was just another of Hussein's many lies. In the meantime he'll only congratulate others for their gayness, as the nation isn't ready for a homosexual Kenyan Muslim Socialist president. I don't know if it ever will be.

TLB #35

NBA Homo

Did you hear about the NBA player that came out as a homosexual? My response to this is why? What does sodomy have to do with playing basketball? Why couldn't you have kept this to yourself? I certainly did not want to know.

How many NBA players have come out as straight? I am pretty sure that there haven't been any. When watching basketball I have never wondered who each player (or any player) was having sexual relations with. But the homosexuals think this is information we need to know.

Washington Wizards center Jason Collins said, in an article he wrote in which he revealed that he prefers it in the butt, claims that he wishes someone else had gone first. Maybe he's worried about "discrimination" from people grossed out that he'd share these disgusting details of his personal life WITH THE WORLD that nobody wanted to know about.

I acknowledge that homosexuals face actual discrimination, and I'm opposed to it. So why did Collins go out of his way to ensure he was subjected to some? That makes no sense to me, and causes me to feel a lot less sympathy for him if any discrimination comes his way.

The policy of not asking and not telling, which we should have kept in the military, seems like the way to go to me. What (or who) everyone does in their personal lives is nobody's business. Not only that, but we really don't want to know (that you enjoy smooching other men because that is not natural).

Also, Jason Collins is black, a community that is seen as being more outspoken with their religion-based objections to men lying with men. I blame Obama for this. If he had not "come out of the closet" in support of queers tying the knot I seriously doubt there would have even been a conversation regarding who the first major league sports player to reveal himself as a homo would be.

Hussein should have stuck with his original position on his issue. He used to support civil unions, but his endorsement of homo marriage emboldened the homosexuals and the homosexual advocates who want us all imagining homosexual sex (and puking). Can there be any doubt that, if not for Obama, Collins would have kept who he has sex with PRIVATE?

It is also my understanding that he isn't that great a player. I certainly hope he does not complain when let go that it's due to his being gay. Check out the picture of Mr. Collins on Wikipedia. I think everyone probably already knew he doesn't like the ladies, and he got the job. So, no false cries of victimization please. But being a Liberal (which he no doubt is) I would not be surprised if that is exactly what happens.

And, no, I am not a homophobe, unless you think Christians who take the Biblical view when it comes to men lying with men are homophobic. That is my personal view, but I'm not going to force anyone to accept it. If you're going to risk eternal damnation that is your business. At least respect my desire to not want it shoved in my face, thank you.

TLB #34

New Pope

This post concerns my opinions regarding the selection of the new pope, an individual who dubbed himself Francis. These are the opinions of someone who is a Christian, but not a Catholic.

The good news is that he opposes abortion, describing the pro-choice movement as a "culture of death". And, in regards to homosexual marriage, Francis says it is "a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God".

So, it is good that he is a strong supporter of traditional marriage, although this is a hardly shocking position, given what it says in the Bible about this kind of perversion being an abomination.

The bad news is his views regarding wealth inequality. Francis believes that "unjust economic structures... give rise to great inequalities", and that "poor people are persecuted for demanding work, [while] rich people are applauded for fleeing from justice".

Blaming wealthy people for the plight of the poor is the Liberal shtick, and actually the opposite of the truth. Wealthy people are often innovators and job creators. Wealth flows FROM such individuals. They are creators of wealth, and the middle class and poor are better off because of their efforts.

It would be more accurate for him to speak against Socialism and Crony capitalism, because these corrupt forms of government are what we can really blame for poverty. Individuals who attain wealth due to either of these forms of thievery (government stealing from it's citizens) do deserve to be demonized, but certainly not all wealthy people fall into this category.

Also, Francis opposed the distribution of contraceptives in Argentina, which is probably not a good idea, simply because of STDs like AIDS. This is a position that likely costs lives. Yeah, we're talking about sinners having extramarital sex, but is this a sin deserving of the death penalty?

In any case, I think many Catholics do not adhere to this edict anyway. On the other hand, I do believe that promoting contraception for teens is wrong. Adults shouldn't be encouraging kids to have sex.

Finally, I've heard some of those discussing this new pope say that he needs to adopt a zero tolerance for clergy involved in covering up child abuse and moving clergy instead of defrocking them and cooperating with the police... which is a position I am in complete agreement with.

And the helping the poor thing is fine; however, the church holds great wealth, and does anyone think they are going to liquidate any large portion of their assets to further that goal (like in the film "The Shoes of the Fisherman")? That would be an exceedingly shocking turn of events.

TLB #20