My sources tell me that, should prez Hussein bomb Syria, a bill for impeachment will be introduced in the House. Apparently SecDef Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee "he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations". House Republicans say that if Panetta and Hussein carry through with those sentiments it would be a violation of Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, which gives the right to declare war to Congress alone.
I say WHY WAIT? Why hasn't Hussein been impeached already? He already broke with the Constitution when he bombed Lybia, as noted by ultra-Liberal congressman Dennis Kucinich. When the most Liberal congressman speaks against the actions of the most Liberal president ever -- one might think the Liberal media would pay attention instead of sweeping the issue under the rug. But no! The Liberal media swept and Kucinich was redistricted out of a job. Coincidence?
Hussein could also be impeached in regards to the Bengazhi cover up, for stealing the election last November, the Fast and Furious cover up, his American citizen hit list, the recess appointments made WHILE Congress was in session, the appointment of czars without Senate approval, violating the 10th amendment by suing Arizona for enforcing immigration laws, executive orders giving amnesty to the here-illegally "dreamers", for his refusal to enforce DOMA, and for his executive actions on gun control.
And, of course there is the fact (or high probability) that his Hawaiian birth certificate is fake. Covering up the fact that you aren't a natural born citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as POTUS, must be an impeachable offense. The Constitution clearly spells out the requirements one must meet to hold the office, and Hussein, due to his either having been born in Kenya or having a non-citizen father, has never even been eligible to be our commander in chief!
That's such a long list, how could anyone not agree that Hussein is one of the most lawless presidents in US history! Many of his offenses are far worse than Watergate, so what is the Republican-controlled House waiting for?? Hopefully the Republicans will retake the Senate in the 2014 midterms and then the impeachment of our illegitimate prez will commence.
The only problem is then we'd be left with dufus Biden as prez. I wonder if he's done anything he could be impeached for? Unfortunately being a bumbling idiot isn't an impeachable offense, although, being the VP, he probably was involved in some of Hussein's anti-Constitutional actions. Maybe we can get them both out and move John Boehner into the presidency?
.
ReplyDeleteYa!
As _YOU_ are calling to impeach the President, why bother trying to focus of his acts and actions? Why don't you impeach President Obama for his greatest crime and something he cannot possibly deny. Shouldn't you impeach Mr Obama for being black? (It is after all why you really want him removed from office, isn't it?)
Just come out of the closet and say it. How can it be called the "_WHITE_" House with 'them' in it?
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
Come on Ema, playing the race card is SO predictable! Is that the best you can come up with? I'm going to guess Yes. I gave you a list of reasons why I believe he should be impeached. Being black wasn't on the list.
DeleteEma is clearly a racist who believes that black people have some sort of special status that makes them immune from the criticism that would ordinarily be leveled against any white person or anyone of any other color, for that matter.
ReplyDeleteI think this is the first time I've seen Ema out herself as a racist.
Yes, Barlowe, Ema believes that blacks are some sort of superior being above the usual reproach or criticism that lesser mortals are due. And as black people are perfect, the only possible reason one would have to criticize a black person, according to Ema, would be their skin color.
"Yes. I gave you a list of reasons why I believe he should be impeached. Being black wasn't on the list."
To spittle-flecking racists like Ema, reading comprehension doesn't matter. Obama's blackness makes him a God among men, to her.
This is a reflection on her, not Obama. It is what makes her different from those who judge matters and individuals on their merits, not their skin color. Ema's insistence that a person's skin color matters is the direct opposite of Dr. King's "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
Indeed, dmarks. Notice that Ema doesn't think I'm racist (against White people) for criticizing Joe Biden? I can criticize him all day long and, although the Liberals will take exception, they'll never say my complaints have anything to do with him being White.
ReplyDeleteBarlowe: And the same people who voted against Bill Clinton for the same reasons are called racists for doing the exact same thing against Barack Obama.
ReplyDeleteWTF? Nixon bombed Hanoi, Reagan bombed Libya, Clinton bombed Bosnia,
ReplyDeleteBush bombed everywhere from the Euphrates to the Hindu Kush...somebody changed the rules?
.
Delete"...somebody changed the rules?"
IOKIYAR (It's OK If You Are RepublicanT).
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
BB: I tend to agree with your point. I would oppose impeaching Obama for striking at another nest of terrorists.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Clinton bombed Iraq (an extended campaign against Saddam's WMD facilities after Saddam completely blocked the required inspections), and he also bombed targets in Kosovo and Serbia. He also famously bombed the Sudan and Afghanistan. I doubt GWB's total was much higher.
What that shows is that if Congress fails to stand up to Presidents who violate the Constitution the president (either party) will start to believe bombing without approval is their right. That does not mean that the Constitution says it is.
ReplyDeleteAnd dmarks, Obama may act to help the Syrian rebels, not against a "nest of terrorists". In any case, why can't he first obtain congressional approval?